Received: (qmail 14744 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 1997 03:55:08 -0000 Delivered-To: hack-chat-archive@mail.secureservers.net Received: (qmail 14724 invoked by uid 1029); 15 Oct 1997 03:54:59 -0000 Delivered-To: hh-chat-archive@mail.secureservers.net Received: (qmail 14711 invoked by uid 411); 15 Oct 1997 03:54:52 -0000 Date: 15 Oct 1997 03:54:51 -0000 Delivered-To: hack-chat@mail.secureservers.net Delivered-To: hh-chat@mail.secureservers.net Message-Id: <2.2.16.19971014214218.13070a56@techbroker.com> X-Sender: cmeinel@techbroker.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: hh-chat@mail.secureservers.net From: "Carolyn P. Meinel" Subject: [HH-CHAT] Communications Security Act Sender: hh-chat-sender@lists.secureservers.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hh-chat@lists.secureservers.net X-Hacking-Heretic : Flush Censorship! Support the Hacking Heretics! X-Loop: Hacking-Heretics-Chat Jericho has been trying to convince you that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC 2701-2711) applies only to the first person in any chain of possession of electronic communications that the owner did not choose to make public. Unfortunately it looks like I must resort to prosecution to prove this particular point to jericho. As for those of you who are able to do a Web search, check out the news story of what happened when a Congressional committee investigating Newt Gingrich made use of an intercepted cell phone conversation. If powerful politician can't get away with it, jericho can't, either. You can also do a Web search to find out whether there is an exemption in the law for errors on the part of your ISP or other people doing work for you. I don't find the exemption. Jericho's post to this list suggests that he hopes that his monumental ignorance of the law, despite my best efforts to educate him, will save him. I can see him before the judge: "Your Honor, Carolyn didn't explain the law to me clearly enough. So that's why I set up a public ftp site with her email. I had absolutely no idea this was even a naughty thing to do, much less a Federal felony," sob, weep. One of these days I'll get around to doing a GTMHH on 18 USC 2701-2711. In the meantime, just remember this. If you use hacking to do something to another person you wouldn't want done to yourself, don't do it. That way you aren't likely to blunder into felony conviction. Carolyn Meinel M/B Research -- The Technology Brokers http://techbroker.com "Inside every digital circuit, there's an analog signal screaming to get out." -- Al Kovalick, Hewlett-Packard "Hex, Bugs, Rock & Roll" -- Bruce Conklin, Space Dynamics Lab, Utah State U.