From: Small Grey (firstname.lastname@example.org) To: email@example.com Cc: Criminals (firstname.lastname@example.org) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 02:08:34 -0500 Subject: Re: Hypocritical Attrition.org email@example.com [firstname.lastname@example.org] staggered from the flesh-eating rain and gurgled: > Oh so now I am supposed to think your misogynistic little sig was funny? > I don't think so. Since when is murdering another human being funny? > Oh...I know ... when it is a woman right? (That's basically the definition > of misogyny). I don't see how the sig was misogynistic. JerkCity is pretty much equal-opportunity when it comes to insults. No, that's not the definition of misogynistic: http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=misogynistic&db=* You need to show that JerkCity is misogynistic. I don't think it is. You would then need to show that not just JerkCity is misogynistic but that I am. But, alas, you're a retard and can't figure this all out yourself. > And yes, I called you an asshole, I said I wouldn't resort to that but I > did. Because you're a hypocritical cock-sucking retard. > You keep insulting me and it makes any kind of real discussion with you > impossible. Also you keep saying things that are 100% off the mark. You > don't know me at all. You are just grasping at straws. Your real motive > here is to insult, not a real discussion or anything. I guess it makes > you feel better about yourself when you can say things like that to other > people. But the truth is, it just shows what you are all about, which is > hiding your inferiority complex. You lick dick: slurp slurp slurp [...] > Yes, but what is the purpose of the insults? They are not necessary to > any real argument. You should know, you hypocritical corn-holio ass-ramming bitch. [...] > > The -only- evidence you can cite for our glorification of > >defacers is running this mirror? Yes, but? Very weak. See > >below. > > Why is it very weak? You make a statement with nothing to back it up. Uh, see below you hypocrital turd jousting sack of shit. [...] > >1) Historical. Having an archive of web site defacements is > >a valuable reference that is used by researchers, law > >enforcement and security professionals. > > Do they pay you for this service? No, we do this as a public service, felching shit sucker. > >2) Statistical. Summarizations of Operating System, web servers, > >and Top Level Domains are also used by industry, security > >professionals, even the government and military. > > Does anyone pay you for this service? See above. Get your hand off your crotch and scroll up, dumb ass. [...] > And that is a total bullshit. You called me a moron. Admit it. After you met certain minimal conditions, yes. But in the first case, not at all. But you're a clueless fuck and couldn't see that, even when I have painly 'splained it to you. [...] > > I love weak sarcasm. Sure, send that glossary along. > > Weak sarcasm? There is an insult right there. Unlike the hypocrital dip shit I am replying to, I didn't claim I wouldn't insult you. Also, you were being inulting in the first place by saying perhaps you should send me a glossary in your next reply, you stinking pole smoker. [...] > >Actually, you are working both sides of the word hacker. Let's > >go ahead and replace "hackers" with what you now claim to mean, > >"illegal hackers": > > Now you try to recover from making a silly mistake. No, I carefully quoted you, then I requoted you with your sentence back to you with your claimed definition of the word. Don't like it? Tough shit, Queen Queef. [...] > > But we haven't created a site all about illegal hacking. > >And if that is indeed what you meant, it's trivial to demonstrate > >that you're just wrong. But given your reply, I don't see much > >of a reason to continue a discussion with you. You're incapable > >of carrying an argument and have to resort to name calling. > Oh, where on your site do you have things for the legal hackers? Do you > mirror their sites too? There's a lot of material at Attrition.org that has nothing to do with our mirror. Perhaps you should stop slurping cock for a moment and figure that out. [...] > > Your stupid little straw man is destroyed. > > Yes, unlike you, I can learn from a discussion with others. I think you have already demonstrated you're a hypocrital moron, without two neurons to rub together. You haven't learned anything but LICKING DICK. [...] > > You're really grasping here. JerkCity is a comic strip. > >Please grow up. And grow a brain stem. > > I don't think it is funny. How would you like me to make a joke about burying > you? Would you think that was funny? How about a joke about murdering > men? Or black people? That wouldn't be funny would it? Fuck you; die, cunt. [...] > I find the supposed intellectual group of hackers ("good hackers and bad > hackers"...duh) to be a lot less educated than your average high school > football player when it comes to women. At least the football player has > had sex with one. I can't even go on to a lot of the so called techie sites > without seeing some kind of bullshit on there like this. COCK SLOBBERY, CASE CLOSED. As if I care to carry on a dialogue with your lame ass any longer. > And what gets me is you paint yourself as somehow better than other people > (just like on the going postal pages). But the fact is you are not better > than anyone. You have no higher morals or caring for anyone other than > yourself. And you tell me to lighten up about a joke about murdering > a woman. I mean you just have no conscience whatsoever. Nor do you know > the difference between right and wrong. I wouldn't be surprised to find > that you are one of the illegal hackers. You fit the sociopathic profile. > Also you really should get some professional help. shut the fuck up, trying to reroute the Pentagon's packets! w00t, y0 y0 y0 so 0wn3d, dude. how about a nice game of chess, be0tch? > Yes, but I am not an idiot. My moral indignation is real. Death to all wimmins! Let's all hack da planet! huh huh huh huh. Fuck you, gash, munge  The aptly named "me", true to sh/he/it's name, is being a dick and has completed dropped the discussion. I reply with a burlesque of sh/he/it's projected image of me.