From gtheall at tenable.com  Fri Nov  1 10:27:01 2013
From: gtheall at tenable.com (George Theall)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:27:01 +0000
Subject: [VIM] VideoCharge Studio '.vsc' File Handling Remote Buffer
 Overflow Vulnerability
Message-ID: <0E138346-05B0-4B1E-A7F0-5528070E7F08@tenable.com>

Dinesh / Narayan / Venkat / Rob : Can you clarify how BID 63364, which was created earlier this week, differs from BID 45183, from 2010?  It looks like yet another duplicate to me.

George
-- 
theall at tenable.com


From Dinesh_Theerthagiri at symantec.com  Fri Nov  8 08:20:55 2013
From: Dinesh_Theerthagiri at symantec.com (Dinesh Theerthagiri)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 06:20:55 -0800
Subject: [VIM] VideoCharge Studio '.vsc' File Handling Remote Buffer
 Overflow Vulnerability
In-Reply-To: <0E138346-05B0-4B1E-A7F0-5528070E7F08@tenable.com>
References: <0E138346-05B0-4B1E-A7F0-5528070E7F08@tenable.com>
Message-ID: <86E9E90EE35E9041B100B9ED1D5C8B57452B67053A@APJ1XCHEVSPIN30.SYMC.SYMANTEC.COM>

George,

Apologies  for the delayed reply. 

BID 63364 is duplicate of BID 45183. 
BID 45183 is update with affected technologies and exploit code. And retired 63364

Thanks,
T.Dinesh

-----Original Message-----
From: vim-bounces at attrition.org [mailto:vim-bounces at attrition.org] On Behalf Of George Theall
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:57 PM
To: Vulnerability Information Managers
Subject: [VIM] VideoCharge Studio '.vsc' File Handling Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Dinesh / Narayan / Venkat / Rob : Can you clarify how BID 63364, which was created earlier this week, differs from BID 45183, from 2010?  It looks like yet another duplicate to me.

George
-- 
theall at tenable.com