[VIM] Bugtraq IDs 43479 and 43523
George A. Theall
theall at tenable.com
Tue Sep 28 14:38:36 CDT 2010
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:14 PM, rkeith wrote:
> No difference, unfortunately. BID 43523 has been retired.
Looks like the earlier BID isn't valid either:
and by extension CVE-2009-2592 / OSVDB 56552. Indeed, looking at the
source, I don't see any SQL statements or mention of a 'mes_id'
parameter / guestbook.php script.
> George A. Theall wrote:
>> What's the difference between Bugtraq IDs 43479 and 43523, Rob? Both
>> seem to have been created yesterday for an issue tracked by
>> CVE-2009-2592 and reported in July 2009.
theall at tenablesecurity.com
More information about the VIM