[VIM] Bugtraq Ids 19233 vs 44071
rkeith at securityfocus.com
Fri Oct 15 12:24:15 CDT 2010
Indeed, those will also be retired as duplicates.
We will be retiring 44060 as a false report shortly as well.
George A. Theall wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:09 PM, rkeith wrote:
>> We'll look into that one, but most likely it is a duplicate. Some of
>> the others are definitely duplicates.
>> This is what we found in our initial search:
> Add to your list:
> - 44063, a duplicate of 19553 (Reporter component).
> - 44065, a duplicate of 18924 (SMF Forum component)
> As for 44060, that was reported back in 2006 and covered by OSVDB 32535.
> It also seems like it might be bogus; ie,
> It doesn't seem that SecurityFocus created a BID for that earlier
> report. Did your earlier research indicate it was indeed bogus? And has
> something changed this time?
More information about the VIM