[VIM] IBM changing significant details?
jericho at attrition.org
Sun Apr 30 05:13:12 EDT 2006
At long last..
: On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, security curmudgeon wrote:
: > I am 99% sure the APAR said 'mklvcopy'. I created the OSVDB entry within
: > hours of Secunia's entry and couldn't find any more info than they had.
: This is one more aspect of the provenance problem: who knew what when,
: and how confident are we that they were right in the first place, and if
: there was an original source, where is it and barring that, how
: confident are we that the original source was interpreted correctly by a
: third party? I don't know if this kind of problem is getting more
: pronounced, or if I'm just getting more sensitive to it now.
NSFOCUS SA2006-02 : IBM AIX mklvcopy Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
NSFOCUS Security Advisory (SA2006-02)
IBM AIX mklvcopy Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Release Date: 2006-04-24
CVE ID: CVE-2006-1246
The vendor has released Patch APAR IY82739 to fix the vulnerability. The
So the bos.rte.lvm vs mklvcopy issue comes to light. Same thing it appears
More information about the VIM