From isn at c4i.org Thu Jun 1 01:47:27 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:47:27 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] ACSAC 22 (Miami Beach, FL) - June 10 - extended deadline Message-ID: Forwareded from: ACSAC Distribution Manager Dear colleague. We are extending the submission deadlines for the technical track, panels, tutorials, workshop till June 10, 2006. Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement. PDF versions at http://www.acsac.org/2006/cfp_2006.pdf http://www.acsac.org/2006/cfp_2006-a4.pdf --------------------------- Call For Participation --------------------------- Submission deadline approaching! 22nd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference December 11-15, 2006 Miami Beach, Florida http://www.acsac.org Submission Acceptance Deadline Notification Technical Track June 10, 2006 Aug. 13, 2006 Panels June 10, 2006 Aug. 13, 2006 Tutorials June 10, 2006 Jul. 20, 2006 Workshop June 10, 2006 Jul. 20, 2006 Case Studies July 1, 2006 Aug. 15, 2006 Works in Progress Sep. 8, 2006 Oct. 1, 2006 See http://www.acsac.org/cfp for detailed submission information! Please submit blinded papers, at most 10 pages in length at 10pt. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACSAC is presented by a group of professionals who are working to facilitate information sharing among colleagues. We're an all-volunteer not-for-profit organization. Our postal address is 2906 Covington Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910-1206. You can help ACSAC reach people who might benefit from this information. Feel free to forward this message with a personal note to your friends and colleagues. They can sign up at http://www.acsac.org/list. We have moved to a new web host and are trying to remove duplicates from our mailing lists. If you receive duplicate messages, or simple want to be removed from our list, please reply with the word REMOVE in the subject. From isn at c4i.org Thu Jun 1 01:47:38 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:47:38 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Computer hacker to appeal sentence Message-ID: http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411749/735744 Jun 1, 2006 A computer hacker is to appeal against his prison sentence for internet fraud, saying it is too severe. Aucklander Mark Hayes, 19, was sentenced last Friday in the District Court in Auckland to two years six months in prison after pleading guilty to more than 100 computer-related offenses and around $38,000 worth of fraud. In sentencing, the Judge called Hayes a "serious recidivist computer criminal" for his offending in 2004 and reoffending while on bail in 2005. Hayes' lawyer Peter Kaye says his client feels his sentence is too high for a person of his age and circumstances. Hayes is not eligible to apply for home detention. The Crown Solicitor for Auckland last week described the sentence as "substantial." Crown Solicitor Simon Moore said such offending would normally draw a jail term of three months at the most but the judge wanted to send a clear message about the seriousness of hacking. The court heard that in 2004, Hayes used a "keystroke logger" hacking device to access the login password details of TradeMe account holders. He used their accounts to buy $18,500 worth of computer and clothing goods, paying for them with other peoples' money whose bank account details he had also hacked into. Hayes pleaded guilty. He then appeared before the court again for similar offending in 2005, again using a "keystroke logger" to get bank account details. He took around $20,000. In sentencing, Judge David Harvey called Hayes a "serious recidivist computer criminal", ordering a jail sentence of 30 months and the repayment of around $18,000. From isn at c4i.org Thu Jun 1 01:47:15 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:47:15 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Security a bridge too far Message-ID: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006250101,00.html By ALEX PEAKE May 31, 2006 THE Sun yesterday exposed security at Britain's biggest naval base as a shambles after strolling unchallenged on to the bridge of a WARSHIP. Our reporter walked through two checkpoints at Plymouth's HM Devonport - brandishing a worker's lost photo ID - before spending an hour on board the Navy's 21,578-ton flagship HMS Ocean. Posing as a cleaner, he strolled around the deck of the giant vessel - even pausing to flick through its log books and sip tea in the galley. Furious Royal Navy chiefs launched TWO probes last night as it emerged most of the ship's 500-strong company were on board. The base is surrounded by a 9ft perimeter fence and guarded by security staff and scores of military police officers with alsatians. But yesterday, armed with just workmen's overalls and the lost pass - handed to us by a concerned reader - our man gained entry after flashing the ID card over 20 yards from guards. They waved him through and even wished him "good morning". Yet had we been terrorists, we could have caused carnage. Within minutes our man found the quay where HMS Ocean, the Navy's largest ship, is moored for maintenance. As ship workers and sailors filed up the gangplank, we followed them on to the warship, designed to hold 18 attack helicopters and an army of highly-trained commandos. Two machine gun-carrying marines were checking passes. But again our man held his finger over the real workman's picture and marched in. Once at the heart of the ship - which is on 24 hours' notice to sail anywhere in the world if a crisis breaks - he was directed by one unwitting worker to the bridge and nerve centre. He toured the area with video gear for 15 minutes before moving to a walkway, where photographer Marc Giddings snapped him from a road. Our reporter also saw the engine room, living quarters and anchor room. Only one sailor asked what he was doing, but he returned to hoisting a flag when told our man was a cleaner. We finally left the ship, praised for leading the Marines' 2003 invasion of southern Iraq, and left the base as easily as we walked in. A Navy spokesman said: "We take all breaches of security very seriously. A full investigation by the ship and the naval base has commenced." From isn at c4i.org Thu Jun 1 01:47:51 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:47:51 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Employees may be opening doors to criminals Message-ID: http://news.ft.com/cms/s/458807fe-efec-11da-b80e-0000779e2340,dwp_uuid=863bb51c-1f76-11da-853a-00000e2511c8.html By Kate Mackenzie May 30 2006 Holding a security door open for someone laden with cups of coffee or a big stack of documents may seem the polite thing to do. But you may have fallen for a classic trick deployed by hackers. The person might have been smartly dressed and looked legitimate, but that is a key part of the deception of "social engineering", which uses simple, everyday situations to deceive individuals into giving out physicial or technical access to facilities that can be a mine of valuable information. Whether getting into a building, eliciting a password over the telephone or persuading a phishing victim to e-mail their banking details, "social engineering" is responsible for more than half of security breaches, and some estimates claim the proportion is as high as 90 per cent. Deploying a powerful firewall or maintaining up-to-date software patches on thousands of desktop machines is easy compared with raising employees' awareness of their own risky behaviour. Last year, for example, three call centre staff at Mphasis, an Indian outsourcer, tricked several Citibank customers into revealing their Pin numbers and then stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, in an incident that rocked the outsourcing industry. Bob Blakley, chief scientist for security and privacy at IBM's Tivoli division, says it is partly because there is no "standard set of social behaviours" for tasks such as resetting a password over the phone, so many people are easily persuaded to go along with risky procedures. The problem is worsening, as hacking attempts and malware are increasingly used by organised criminals, rather than fame-hungry or curious geeks. Despite a consensus that it is always people who are the weakest point in any security system, workplace prevention tactics are often neglected or relegated to a set of acceptable use policies that are largely ignored by staff. By contrast, meticulous and detailed documents on the dishonest use of "social engineering" techniques are easily available on the internet. One such document details a vast number of techniques, ranging from "dumpster diving" to shoulder surfing - looking over someone's shoulder as they key in a password or Pin - to "conformity": for example, telling the target that everyone else has given out their password over the phone. Appealing to people's better nature by phoning up and pretending to be an out-of-town colleague who urgently needs to access the network is another. In spite of all the experimentation and refinement of techniques to persuade and confuse potential "social engineering" targets, the security industry's response is almost exclusively focused on technology rather than psychology. What can be done about it? The first thing is to take a wider view of security, says Jan Babiak, Head of Information Security at Ernst & Young. "For example in certain countries, you have a very good chance of kidnapping senior executives. The physical security [team] take enormous precautions, but the IT people might have left something like a calender somewhere where it's easy to hack into." Cisco, meanwhile, urges executives to create a "top-down" culture of security awareness instead of palming off all security to a separate team. Dave Shackleford, the director of security solutions and assessment services at Vigilar, a US security consultancy, says that executives are often the softest target for "social engineering" experiments. They tend to think they are "above the law" and have access to high level information. They are also used to associating with other top-level people, says Shackleford, so their trust levels are higher. Mr Shackleford frequently puts clients' security defences to the test by, for example, photographing staff IDs with a telephoto lens to copy them. No attempted physical test undertaken by Vigilar has failed, he says. Mr Shackleford says companies need policies in place: "If they don't have explicit policies laid out for their employees, then they may not know any better." Vigilar's clients act on the information gleaned from the tests in different ways, but punishing employees who fell for a "social engineering" trick is not usually one of them. "It's human nature to be helpful," says Mr Shackleford. Instead, they tend to respond by improving training and awareness procedures. Some of Mr Shackleford's techniques are frighteningly simple: "Just phoning someone's extension can reveal if they are out of town, for example, and for how long." Robert Chapman, chief executive of The Training Camp, which runs security awareness courses for non-IT staff, says: "All the talk and all the money really is on technology. People in a sense brag about how much they spent on their Cisco firewalls." But they overlook the obvious weaknesses. His company recently ran the well-publicised "CD test" in London in which 100 CDs were handed out to workers in the City, promising a free Valentine's Day gift if they installed it. Once installed the CD reported back to Chapman; he says the majority of recipients did so. Bruce Schneier, the cryptographer who also works as a security consultant, is not so sure. He believes technical security must take into account behaviours, but does not believe "social engineering" can be adequately guarded against by training: "Have you ever met a user?" he replies when asked about efforts to improve staff awareness. Technology, Mr Schneier says, must be more tailored to each user's needs and risk levels. Does a typical office worker, for example, need to have access to a USB port or even a CD drive? "This is not just a 'get some guys on and solve it' problem," says Schneier. "It's like murder, burglary - all of these things, they've been around for ever." From isn at c4i.org Thu Jun 1 01:48:50 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:48:50 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Police close file sharing site Message-ID: http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=3955&date=20060531 By James Savage 31st May 2006 Police have closed down The Pirate Bay, a Sweden-based file sharing site and one of the most popular websites of its kind in the world. Three people were taken in for questioning after police raids in Sweden on Wednesday. The trio, ages 22, 24 and 28, are suspected of violating property rights legislation, police spokesman Ulf G?ranzon said. Servers connected to the site have been impounded and the site was down on Wednesday afternoon, although the operators of The Pirate Bay have set up a temporary website to provide updates on the situation. Some fifty policemen and women were involved in raids on ten homes and offices in Sweden. The three men taken in by police were still being questioned on Wednesday afternoon. They all have links to The Pirate Bay. Prosecutors will decide whether to detain the men after they have been questioned. "The suspects are not people who download files, but are people who have relations to the website," Ulf G?ranzon told The Local. He would not reveal anything more about the roles that the men played. Police have been monitoring the website and the men behind it for some time. Computers were taken during raids on the men's homes and offices to secure evidence. "We are now going to look at how the operation is structured," G?ranzon said. "At the moment we are talking to lots of people about this case. We are still at a very early stage in our investigations," he said. He would not reveal whether police had their eyes on further suspects. Henrik Pont?n, lawyer at Antipiratbyr?n (The Anti-Pirate Bureau) in Stockholm, welcomed the move to close down the site. "It is good that the Swedish police are now prioritising this kind of crime. The copyright laws finance creativity within film, computer gaming, music and other culture," said Pont?n. "People who break copyright laws steal from the creators and movie-watching public of the future. The closure of The Pirate Bay is therefore good for all of us who enjoy new film and entertainment." But Tobias Andersson at pressure group Piratbyr?n (The Pirate Bureau), which founded The Pirate Bay, stressed that there was no copyright-protected material on the servers. "The Anti-Pirate Bureau has clearly misled the police in this case," said Andersson. "They appear to have persuaded police who are incompetent in IT that the servers in question are full of copyright-protected material. This is a gross misuse of taxpayers' money." Andersson also condemned the fact that police had closed down a number of other websites, including The Pirate Bureau, which he says is no longer officially linked to the Pirate Bay. "This is the greatest infringement. The Anti-Pirate Bureau has clearly fooled the police into closing down its antagonists, The Pirate Bureau." "We are very upset that the film industry doesn't dare to have a debate, and chooses instead to trick politicians and the police into criminalizing their opponents and a large portion of the Swedish population." The Pirate Bay is a BitTorrent tracker, which enables people to download large files such as movies from other users. From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:16:58 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:16:58 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Ernst & Young laptop loss exposes 243, 000 Hotels.com customers Message-ID: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/01/ey_hotels_laptop/ By Ashlee Vance in Mountain View 1st June 2006 Exclusive - Ernst & Young's laptop loss unit continues to be one of the company's more productive divisions. We learn this week that the accounting firm lost a system containing data on 243,000 Hotels.com customers. Hotels.com joins the likes of Sun Microsystems, IBM, Cisco, BP and Nokia, which have all had their employees' data exposed by Ernst & Young, as revealed here in a series of exclusive stories. The Register can again exclusively confirm the loss of the Hotels.com customer information after having received a copy of a letter mailed out jointly by the web site and Ernst & Young. A Hotels.com spokesman also confirmed the data breach, saying Ernst & Young notified the company of the laptop loss on May 3. The laptop in question was stolen from an Ernst & Young worker's car in Texas and did have some basic data protection mechanisms such as, erm, the need for a password. "Recently, Hotels.com was informed by its outside auditor, Ernst & Young, that one of Ernst & Young's employees had his laptop computer stolen," Hotels.com told its customers in the letter. "Unfortunately, the computer contained certain information about customer transactions with Hotels.com, and other sites through which we provide booking services directly to customers, from 2002 through 2004. "This information may have included your name, address and some credit or debit card information you provided at that time." Ernst & Young in February lost one laptop that held information on what's believed to be tens of thousands of Sun, IBM, Cisco, BP and Nokia employees. It's not clear if this was the same system in the Hotels.com incident. Ernst & Young has not returned our calls seeking comment and has been reluctant to provide information on these incidents in the past. Ernst & Young in February also lost four laptops in Miami when its workers decided to leave their systems in a hotel conference room while they went out for lunch. Major media outlets have so far ignored the Ernst & Young laptop incidents, although they were quick to follow on our confirmation of a Fidelity data breach that saw 200,000 HP workers have their information exposed. Ernst & Young offers a variety of security services to customers, and encourages clients to be transparent with their policies around customer data issues. The company, however, has not exactly been proactive with regard to its own issues. ? From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:17:10 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:10 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Cern seeks to tighten security for data grid Message-ID: http://www.vnunet.com/computing/news/2157258/cern-seeks-tighten-security Lara Williams Computing 01 Jun 2006 Cern, the world's largest particle physics laboratory and birthplace of the web, is starting a two-year project to improve security for its worldwide data grid. The European organisation for nuclear research identified that partner sites on the grid are a security concern; many are open access public institutions supporting the lab's projects. Cern tests innovative technologies in partnership with industry, and has asked security specialists Stonesoft and F-Secure to test security for the launch of the large hadron collider (LHC) project next year. The 27km underground particle accelerator will distribute large amounts of information onto the worldwide LHC computing grid. More than 1GB per second of data will be generated and either stored at Cern or sent to 12 major computing sites and a further 100 institutes around the world for analysis. "The results of the security trials may provide solutions which could eventually be commercially available to other organisations," said Cern spokesman Francois Grey. Although large data grids are only starting to be used in business, Cern is seeing a lot of interest from industry. The lab is developing grids that will reach across organisational boundaries, allowing multiple institutions to share resources. "Businesses are now becoming interested in this kind of grid," said Grey. "Its use could enable suppliers and companies to share resources and large corporations to share information between business units. Grid technology will only be adopted if the right type of security solutions are available." Particle collisions in the LHC will create 15 petabytes per year of data, and it is due to run for a decade. The grid will have a storage and analysis infrastructure accessed by more than 7,000 scientists worldwide. The aim of the LHC is to simulate the events taking place one millionth of a millionth of a second after the universe was created - information that could revolutionise our understanding of how the natural world works. From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:16:29 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:16:29 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] VA Data in Format Not Widely Used Message-ID: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/31/AR2006053102000.html By Christopher Lee Washington Post Staff Writer June 1, 2006 The sensitive personal information of 26.5 million veterans that was stolen from a Department of Veterans Affairs data analyst last month was stored in a format that could make it difficult for thieves to use, according to an internal VA memo. In the May 5 memo, VA privacy officer Mark Whitney wrote that the critical data "may not be easily accessible" because most of it -- including names, birth dates and Social Security numbers -- was stored in a specialized, standard format used for data manipulation and statistical analysis. The format "requires specialized application software and training" to write computer code "to access and manipulate the data for use," Whitney wrote in the memo, obtained yesterday by The Washington Post. Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology, a privacy group, said Whitney is generally right that the information would be hard to extract. It would be easier, however, if the laptop stolen along with an external hard drive and several data disks has the software needed to view the data, he said. "This is not nearly the type of protection they would have had if they had followed basic security procedures and encrypted this," Schwartz said. The Whitney memo, dated two days after the burglary at the analyst's Aspen Hill home and distributed to several high-ranking VA officials, provides the first public indication that some addresses and telephone numbers were among the stolen data; it refers to such information being part of electronic files of a national survey of about 20,000 veterans in 2001. Also stolen was an electronic spreadsheet with 6,744 records about "mustard gas veterans" -- generally, veterans who took part in chemical warfare tests during World War II. Another stolen file contains as many as 10 diagnostic codes from the treatment file of one veteran who visited the VA health-care system on 57 dates. "These type of data contain more than limited financial information, the codes contain information about veterans' medical conditions," Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) said in a statement. "It is not appropriate for this information to ever enter the public domain." Matthew Burns, a VA spokesman, said the department has been "focused on getting notification to veterans that some of the most sensitive data was out there." Also yesterday, VA Secretary Jim Nicholson announced that he had named Richard M. Romley, a former prosecutor from Maricopa County, Ariz., as his new special adviser for information security. Romley, a Marine Corps veteran, will evaluate the department's computer security procedures and recommend improvements. The move follows the resignation last week of Michael H. McLendon, a VA deputy assistant secretary who learned of the May 3 burglary within hours of the crime but did not immediately tell top-ranked officials. Nicholson announced Tuesday that the employee will be fired and that Dennis M. Duffy, who has been acting assistant secretary for policy and planning, had been placed on administrative leave. The employee worked in McLendon's office, and Duffy was in charge of the division in which both worked. Nicholson learned of the information breach on May 16 and told the public on May 22, nearly three weeks after the crime. ? 2006 The Washington Post Company From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:16:46 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:16:46 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] The new breed of cyber-terrorist Message-ID: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article622421.ece By Jimmy Lee Shreeve 31 May 2006 According to cyber-security experts, the terror attacks of 11 September and 7 July could be seen as mere staging posts compared to the havoc and devastation that might be unleashed if terrorists turn their focus from the physical to the digital world. Scott Borg, the director and chief economist of the US Cyber Consequences Unit (CCU), a Department of Homeland Security advisory group, believes that attacks on computer networks are poised to escalate to full-scale disasters that could bring down companies and kill people. He warns that intelligence "chatter" increasingly points to possible criminal or terrorist plans to destroy physical infrastructure, such as power grids. Al-Qa'ida, he stresses, is becoming capable of carrying out such attacks. Most companies and organisations seem oblivious to the threat. Usually, they worry about e-mail viruses and low-grade hacker attacks. But Borg sees these as the least of their worries. "Up to now, executives and network professionals have worried about what adolescents and petty criminals have been doing," he says. "In most cases, these kinds of cyber attacks aren't very destructive. The reason is that businesses generally have enough inventory and extra capacity to make up for any short-term interruptions." What companies and organisations should worry about, Borg insists, is "what grown-ups could do" - terrorists or hardcore criminals. One key target would probably be the vital Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (Scada) systems in power plants and similar industries. "Chatter on Scada attacks is increasing," says Borg, referring to patterns of behaviour that suggest that criminal gangs and militant groups are now fully capable of unleashing such attacks. "Control systems are a particular worry, because these are the computer systems that manage physical processes. They open and shut the valves, adjust the temperatures, throw the switches, regulate the pressures," he says. "Think of the control systems for chemical plants, railway lines, or manufacturing facilities. Shutting these systems down is a nuisance. Causing them to do the wrong thing at the wrong time is much worse." Until now, hackers have usually targeted credit cards or personal information on the web. More sophisticated hackers, however, are beginning to focus on databases. The type of data most likely to be hit, Borg says, might include a pharmaceutical company's drug development databases, or programs that manipulate data, such as formulas for generating financial statements. "Many attacks of this kind would have two components. One would alter the process control system to produce a defective product. The other would alter the quality control system so that the defect wouldn't easily be detected," Borg says. "Imagine, say, a life-saving drug being produced and distributed with the wrong level of active ingredients. This could gradually result in large numbers of deaths or disabilities. Yet it might take months before someone figured out what was going on." The result, he says, would be panic, people afraid to visit hospitals and health services facing huge lawsuits. Deadly scenarios could occur in industry, too. Online outlaws might change key specifications at a car factory, Borg says, causing a car to "burst into flames after it had been driven for a certain number of weeks". Apart from people being injured or killed, the car maker would collapse. "People would stop buying cars." A few such attacks, run simultaneously, would send economies crashing. Populations would be in turmoil. At the click of a mouse, the terrorists would have won. Is Borg justified in his fears? All this sounds like a plot from a thriller; it's hard to take it seriously. But intelligence reports in the last year or so make for worrying reading. An assessment by the British security service MI5 stated that "Britain is four meals away from anarchy". And officials admit their greatest fears about electronic attacks focus on the more exposed networks that make up the "critical national infrastructure" - the systems Borg is concerned about. US agencies are concerned that terrorists could combine electronic and physical attacks to devastating effect, such as disrupting emergency services at the same time as mounting a bomb attack. Risk management analysts, equally edgy, are focusing on the financial impact on businesses and economies. They believe that an online attack would undermine public confidence in vital industries, especially utilities. Nick Robson, a partner at JLT Risk Solutions, says: "A cyber attack on, say, the power industry would cause communications operations to close down for a period of time, expose customers to loss of service, increase liability exposure and ultimately damage reputation for service delivery." It isn't just Western nations that fear a digital meltdown. This month, the Malaysian government announced plans to establish a centre to fight cyber-terrorism, which will provide an emergency response to hi-tech attacks around the globe. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the facility - to be located at the technology hub of Cyberjaya outside Kuala Lumpur - would be called the International Multilateral Partnership against Cyber-Terrorism, or Impact, and would be funded by a combination of government revenue and the private sector. Badawi said the threat of cyber-terrorism was too serious for governments to ignore. "The potential to wreak havoc and cause disruption to people, governments and global systems has increased as the world becomes more globalised," he said. "The economic loss caused by a cyber attack can be truly severe; for example, a nationwide blackout, collapse of trading systems or the crippling of a central bank's cheque clearing system." While the case for cyber attack appears persuasive, some believe that much of it is hype. "It's difficult to avoid comparisons with the Millennium bug and the predictions of widespread computer chaos arising from the change of date to the year 2000," says Tom Standage, technology editor at The Economist magazine. "Then, as now, the alarm was sounded by technology vendors and consultants, who stood to gain from scaremongering." Almost ?400m was spent by the Government alone on preparations for the Millennium bug. Computer consultants issued dire warnings of the danger of an information technology breakdown that could paralyse nations on New Year's Day 2000. When the clock struck midnight, however, few problems were reported. There is scepticism that the bug was ever a threat. As far as Standage is concerned, those in the cyber-security industry - be they vendors boosting sales, academics chasing grants or politicians looking for bigger budgets - always have a "built-in incentive to overstate the risks". But what of the Scada systems; surely they are highly vulnerable? "It is true that utility companies and other operators of critical infrastructure are increasingly connected to the internet," Standage concedes. "But just because customers pay their bills online, it doesn't follow that critical control systems are vulnerable to attack. Control systems are usually kept entirely separate from other systems, for good reason. They tend to be obscure, old-fashioned systems that are incompatible with internet technology anyhow. Even authorised users require specialist knowledge." A simulation in 2002 by the US Naval War College concluded that an "electronic Pearl Harbor" attack on America's infrastructure would certainly cause serious disruption. But to pull it off would require five years of preparation and a $200m budget. As US computer security guru Bruce Schneier says: "If they want to attack, they will do it with bombs like they always have." But Richard Clarke, a former cyber-security expert in the Bush administration, says this is complacent. "People claim no one will ever die in a cyber-attack, but they're wrong. This is a serious threat." Clarke says that each time the US government has tested the security of the electric power industry, he and his colleagues have been able to hack their way in, "sometimes through an obscure route like the billing system". He reveals that computer security officers at a number of chemical plants have told him privately that they are very concerned about the openness of their networks. Scott Borg of the Cyber Consequences Unit goes along with this. He believes the $93m budget for 2007 allocated to the Department of Homeland Security to defend against cyber attack is justified. "Even systems isolated from the internet are often accessible to thousands of employees. How secure can any system be if thousands of people and thousands of data ports can provide inside access to that system?" The threat from software IT security consulting firm Cyber Defense Agency (CDA) has warned the US military, government and "critical infrastructure agencies" against using outsourced commercial software which could be tampered with by terrorists. CDA said that gas, electricity, telecommunications, banking and water companies are among the services that could fall foul of cyber terrorists exploiting "life-cycle" weaknesses buried deep in the software code. Life-cycle attacks occur when one line of code is programmed to open vulnerabilities within the software, exposing the software and the company to external threats. "Outsourced commercial software poses a silent but significant security risk to the defence and welfare of the US," says Sami Saydjari, president of CDA. "The chances of strategic damage from a cyber-terrorist attack on the US increases the longer it takes to remedy the risks posed by outsourced software." From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:17:21 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Extortion virus code gets cracked Message-ID: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5038330.stm 1 June 2006 Do not panic if your data is hidden by virus writers demanding a ransom. Poor programming has allowed anti-virus companies to discover the password to retrieve the hijacked data inside a virus that has claimed at least one UK victim. The Archiveus virus caught out British nurse Helen Barrow and swapped her data with a password-protected file. The virus is the latest example of so-called "ransomware" that tries to extort cash from victims. Code breaker Analysis of Archiveus has revealed that the password to unlock the file containing all the hijacked files is contained within the code of the virus itself. This virus swaps files found in the "My Documents" folder on Windows with a single file protected by a 30-digit password. Victims are only told the password if they buy drugs from one of three online pharmacies. The 30-digit password locking the files is "mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw". Using the password should restore all the hijacked files. "Now the password has been uncovered, there should be no reason for anyone hit by this ransomware attack to have to make any payments to the criminals behind it," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for security firm Sophos. Archiveus was discovered on 6 May but it took the rest of the month for the first victim, Rochdale nurse Helen Barrow, to emerge. Ms Barrow is thought to have fallen victim when she responded to an on-screen message warning her that her computer had contracted another unnamed virus. The virus asks those it infects to buy drugs on one of three websites to get their files back. "When I realised what had happened, I just felt sick to the core," said Ms Barrow about the incident. The Archiveus virus is only the latest in a series of malicious programs used by extortionists to extract cash from victims. Archiveus seems to use some parts of another ransoming virus called Cryzip that was circulating in March 2006. From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:17:32 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:32 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Miami U. reports 2nd security breach Message-ID: http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1149150686240780.xml&coll=2 June 01, 2006 Associated Press An employee at a Miami University branch campus lost a hand-held personal computer containing private information on 851 students, but school officials said they don't believe that the data has been used unlawfully. The recent case involves a potential breach of privacy that the school takes very seriously, said Kelly Cowan, interim dean at the Middletown campus. Students affected were enrolled between July 2001 and May 2006, representing about 8 percent of the students on campus during that five-year period. It's the second security breach at Miami since last September, when officials said a report containing some private information on students was accidentally placed in a file accessible through the Internet. It included names, Social Security numbers and information on the 21,762 students enrolled on all Miami campuses in the fall of 2002. Cowan said the school is tightening its security and increasing employee training. From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:17:45 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:45 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Toronto firm at centre of security breach Message-ID: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&pubid=968163964505&cid=1149113029270&col=968705899037&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188492 By TYLER HAMILTON BUSINESS REPORTER Jun. 1, 2006 Toronto software provider Hummingbird Ltd. has found itself at the centre of an embarrassing privacy accident involving the social security numbers of 1.3 million American students. Hummingbird disclosed yesterday evening that one of its employees lost a piece of computer equipment that contained the names and social security numbers of customers who borrowed funds from Round Rock, Tex.-based Texas Guaranteed, a non-profit company that administers a U.S. family education loan program. "The privacy of customer data is of utmost importance to us and we take our responsibility to safeguard it very seriously. We deeply regret that this incident has occurred," Barry Litwin, Hummingbird?s president and chief executive, said in a statement. "We continue to investigate the facts surrounding this loss of information and are taking all necessary action in order to ensure that such occurrences do not happen in the future." Hummingbird, which announced on May 26 that it is being acquired by Palo Alto, Calif.-based holding company Symphony Technology Group for $465 million (U.S.), said it has no reason to believe the equipment was stolen to obtain confidential data. The company said the equipment was password-protected and that it was "extremely unlikely" the data would be misused. Hummingbird was given the data as part of a contract to develop a custom document management system for Texas Guaranteed. According to information on Texas Guaranteed?s Web site, the equipment was lost on May 24 but Hummingbird didn?t notify the company until mid-afternoon on May 26, the day Hummingbird disclosed its deal with Symphony. The U.S. loan provider said that customers whose information was lost will be notified over the coming weeks and given advice on how to guard against identity theft. "Even though this information is not easily accessed and used, and even though the loss appears to be inadvertent, we are issuing this release out of an abundance of caution, because the piece of equipment has not been located," said Sue McMillin, president and CEO of Texas Guaranteed, in a statement. The use of social security numbers as a form of identification in the United States has been a topic of considerable controversy in recent weeks. In early May, computer disks containing the social security numbers of 26.5 million U.S. veterans were stolen from the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, putting millions of Americans at risk of identity fraud. From isn at c4i.org Fri Jun 2 01:18:07 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:18:07 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Secunia Weekly Summary - Issue: 2006-22 Message-ID: ======================================================================== The Secunia Weekly Advisory Summary 2006-05-25 - 2006-06-01 This week: 102 advisories ======================================================================== Table of Contents: 1.....................................................Word From Secunia 2....................................................This Week In Brief 3...............................This Weeks Top Ten Most Read Advisories 4.......................................Vulnerabilities Summary Listing 5.......................................Vulnerabilities Content Listing ======================================================================== 1) Word From Secunia: The Secunia staff is spending hours every day to assure you the best and most reliable source for vulnerability information. Every single vulnerability report is being validated and verified before a Secunia advisory is written. Secunia validates and verifies vulnerability reports in many different ways e.g. by downloading the software and performing comprehensive tests, by reviewing source code, or by validating the credibility of the source from which the vulnerability report was issued. As a result, Secunia's database is the most correct and complete source for recent vulnerability information available on the Internet. Secunia Online Vulnerability Database: http://secunia.com/ ======================================================================== 2) This Week in Brief: eEye Digital Security has reported a vulnerability in Symantec Client Security and Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a user's system. Users of Symantec products are advised to view the referenced Secunia advisory for additional details and information about patches. Reference: http://secunia.com/SA20318 -- VIRUS ALERTS: Secunia has not issued any virus alerts during the week. ======================================================================== 3) This Weeks Top Ten Most Read Advisories: 1. [SA20153] Microsoft Word Malformed Object Code Execution Vulnerability 2. [SA19762] Internet Explorer "object" Tag Memory Corruption Vulnerability 3. [SA20107] RealVNC Password Authentication Bypass Vulnerability 4. [SA19738] Internet Explorer "mhtml:" Redirection Disclosure of Sensitive Information 5. [SA20261] Cisco VPN Client Privilege Escalation Vulnerability 6. [SA19521] Internet Explorer Window Loading Race Condition Address Bar Spoofing 7. [SA18680] Microsoft Internet Explorer "createTextRange()" Code Execution 8. [SA20288] Novell Netware abend.log User Credentials Disclosure 9. [SA15601] Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Frame Injection Vulnerability 10. [SA20300] Basic Analysis and Security Engine "BASE_path" File Inclusion ======================================================================== 4) Vulnerabilities Summary Listing Windows: [SA20361] wodSFTP ActiveX Component Arbitrary File Access Vulnerability [SA20318] Symantec Client Security / AntiVirus Unspecified Code Execution [SA20407] F-Secure Products Web Console Buffer Overflow Vulnerability [SA20357] Enigma Haber Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20355] AspSitem SQL Injection and Private Message Disclosure [SA20348] Nukedit "groupid" Parameter Administrator Register Vulnerability [SA20347] Hitachi HITSENSER3 SQL Injection Vulnerability [SA20335] My Web Server Long URL Denial of Service [SA20317] Mini-NUKE SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20309] qjForum member.asp SQL Injection Vulnerability [SA20294] NewsCMSLite Admin Logon Bypass Vulnerability [SA20360] ASPBB "search" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20319] Omegasoft Insel "WCE" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting [SA20342] Jiwa Financials Information Disclosure Vulnerability UNIX/Linux: [SA20313] Ubuntu update for nagios [SA20281] Mandriva update for mpg123 [SA20398] SUSE update for kernel [SA20374] 4nForum "tid" Parameter SQL Injection Vulnerability [SA20345] Gentoo update for libtiff [SA20344] Gentoo update for cherrypy [SA20339] Mandriva update for dia [SA20338] Debian update for kernel-source-2.4.17 [SA20326] Debian update for libextractor [SA20323] Open-Xchange Default Account Password [SA20314] Ubuntu update for postgresql [SA20284] Pre News Manager Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20381] UnixWare update for MySQL [SA20283] Debian update for awstats [SA20396] SUSE update for rug [SA20389] FreeBSD ypserv Inoperative Access Controls Security Issue [SA20333] Debian update for mysql-dfsg [SA20302] OpenOBEX ircp File Overwrite Vulnerability [SA20390] FreeBSD SMBFS chroot Directory Traversal Vulnerability [SA20388] SUSE update for vixie-cron [SA20380] Vixie Cron "do_command.c" setuid Security Issue [SA20370] Shadow "useradd.c" Insecure Mailbox File Permissions [SA20368] Debian update for motor [SA20332] Avaya PDS Software Distributor Privilege Escalation [SA20329] Motor ktools VGETSTRING Buffer Overflow Vulnerability [SA20325] AIX lsmcode Unspecified Privilege Escalation Vulnerability [SA20312] SUSE update for foomatic-filters [SA20369] xine-lib HTTP Response Heap Corruption Weakness [SA20330] Debian update for tiff [SA20315] Debian update for dovecot [SA20308] Dovecot "LIST" Command Directory Traversal Weakness [SA20349] Linux Kernel SMP "/proc" Race Condition Denial of Service [SA20337] PHP "curl_init()" Safe Mode Bypass Weakness Other: [SA20378] Secure Elements Class 5 AVR Multiple Vulnerabilities [SA20343] D-Link Airspot DSA-3100 Gateway "uname" Cross-Site Scripting [SA20288] Novell Netware abend.log User Credentials Disclosure [SA20377] Secure Elements Class 5 AVR Message Encryption Security Issue Cross Platform: [SA20404] METAjour "system_path" Parameter File Inclusion Vulnerabilities [SA20399] Ottoman "default_path" File Inclusion Vulnerabilities [SA20373] phpMyDesktop|arcade Local File Inclusion and Script Insertion [SA20364] IBM DCE Two Kerberos Vulnerabilities [SA20358] F at cile Interactive Web Multiple Vulnerabilities [SA20356] tinyBB SQL Injection and File Inclusion Vulnerabilities [SA20354] phpBB Activity Mod Plus Module "phpbb_root_path" File Inclusion [SA20353] UBB.threads Cross-Site Scripting and File Inclusion [SA20350] phpBB Blend Portal System Module "phpbb_root_path" File Inclusion [SA20346] Fastpublish CMS "config[fsBase]" File Inclusion Vulnerabilities [SA20331] Hot Open Tickets "CLASS_PATH" Parameter File Inclusion [SA20310] Plume CMS "/manager/frontinc/prepend.php" File Inclusion [SA20301] open-medium.CMS "404.php" File Inclusion Vulnerability [SA20300] Basic Analysis and Security Engine "BASE_path" File Inclusion [SA20299] ActionApps "GLOBALS[AA_INC_PATH]" File Inclusion [SA20298] DoceboLMS "lang" Parameter File Inclusion Vulnerabilities [SA20292] Back-End CMS "_PSL[classdir]" File Inclusion Vulnerability [SA20375] pppBLOG "files[0]" Parameter Disclosure of Sensitive Information [SA20367] WebCalendar "includedir" Parameter Arbitrary Setting File Loading [SA20366] WikiNi Script Insertion Vulnerabilities [SA20359] phpBB Nivisec Hacks List Module Local File Inclusion [SA20352] Eggblog posts.php SQL Injection Vulnerability [SA20351] aMule Information Disclosure Vulnerability [SA20316] Geeklog Multiple Vulnerabilities and Weaknesses [SA20307] Seditio "Referer" HTTP Header Script Insertion Vulnerability [SA20304] ByteHoard File Copy and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities [SA20303] MailManager PostgreSQL Encoding-Based SQL Injection [SA20297] V-webmail "CONFIG[pear_dir]" File Inclusion Vulnerability [SA20295] Pre Shopping Mall SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20290] ChatPat Script Insertion and SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20287] iFdate Cross-Site Scripting and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities [SA20286] Realty Pro One Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection [SA20363] XiTi Tracking Script "xiti.js" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities [SA20341] Open Searchable Image Catalogue SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [SA20340] DGNews "upprocess.php" File Upload Vulnerability [SA20336] Photoalbum B&W "index.php" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities [SA20334] TikiWiki Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities [SA20327] Achievo "atkselector" Parameter SQL Injection Vulnerability [SA20324] Vacation Rental Script "obj" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting [SA20322] Pretty Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20321] Smile Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20320] Morris Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20311] php-residence Multiple Script Insertion Vulnerabilities [SA20306] PHPSimpleChoose Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20305] PHP-AGTC membership system "useremail" Script Insertion [SA20296] CMS Mundo "searchstring" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20293] phpESP ADOdb Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities [SA20291] AZ Photo Album Script Pro Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20289] Elite-Board "search" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability [SA20285] Assetman Unspecified Script Insertion Vulnerabilities [SA20282] iFlance Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities ======================================================================== 5) Vulnerabilities Content Listing Windows:-- [SA20361] wodSFTP ActiveX Component Arbitrary File Access Vulnerability Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of system information, Exposure of sensitive information, System access Released: 2006-05-31 Will Dormann has reported a vulnerability in WeOnlyDo wodSFTP, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose sensitive information and potentially compromise a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20361/ -- [SA20318] Symantec Client Security / AntiVirus Unspecified Code Execution Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-29 eEye Digital Security has reported a vulnerability in Symantec Client Security and Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20318/ -- [SA20407] F-Secure Products Web Console Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS, System access Released: 2006-06-01 A vulnerability has been reported in F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange and F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20407/ -- [SA20357] Enigma Haber Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported some vulnerabilities in Enigma Haber, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20357/ -- [SA20355] AspSitem SQL Injection and Private Message Disclosure Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data, Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported two vulnerabilities in AspSitem, which can be exploited by malicious users to disclose sensitive information or malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20355/ -- [SA20348] Nukedit "groupid" Parameter Administrator Register Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-05-30 FarhadKey has discovered a vulnerability in Nukedit, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20348/ -- [SA20347] Hitachi HITSENSER3 SQL Injection Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-31 A vulnerability has been reported in Hitachi HITSENSER3, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20347/ -- [SA20335] My Web Server Long URL Denial of Service Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS Released: 2006-05-29 s3rv3r_hack3r has discovered a vulnerability in My Web Server, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20335/ -- [SA20317] Mini-NUKE SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported some vulnerabilities in Mini-NUKE, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20317/ -- [SA20309] qjForum member.asp SQL Injection Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-29 ajann has reported a vulnerability in qjForum, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20309/ -- [SA20294] NewsCMSLite Admin Logon Bypass Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-05-26 FarhadKey has discovered a vulnerability in NewsCMSLite, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20294/ -- [SA20360] ASPBB "search" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported a vulnerability in ASPBB, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20360/ -- [SA20319] Omegasoft Insel "WCE" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-31 MC.Iglo has reported a vulnerability in Omegasoft Insel, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20319/ -- [SA20342] Jiwa Financials Information Disclosure Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From local network Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-30 Robert Passlow has reported a vulnerability in Jiwa Financials, which can be exploited by malicious users to disclose potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20342/ UNIX/Linux:-- [SA20313] Ubuntu update for nagios Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS, System access Released: 2006-05-30 Ubuntu has issued an update for nagios. This fixes a vulnerability, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) and potentially compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20313/ -- [SA20281] Mandriva update for mpg123 Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-29 Mandriva has issued an update for mpg123. This fixes a vulnerability, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20281/ -- [SA20398] SUSE update for kernel Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass, Exposure of system information, Exposure of sensitive information, DoS Released: 2006-06-01 SUSE has issued an update for the kernel. This fixes some vulnerabilities and weaknesses, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to bypass certain security restrictions, gain knowledge of potentially sensitive information and to cause a DoS (Denial of Service), and by malicious people to disclose certain system information, potentially to bypass certain security restrictions and to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20398/ -- [SA20374] 4nForum "tid" Parameter SQL Injection Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-31 CrAzY CrAcKeR has reported a vulnerability in 4nForum, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20374/ -- [SA20345] Gentoo update for libtiff Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS, System access Released: 2006-05-31 Gentoo has issued an update for libtiff. This fixes some vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) and potentially to compromise a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20345/ -- [SA20344] Gentoo update for cherrypy Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-31 Gentoo has issued an update for cherrypy. This fixes a vulnerability, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20344/ -- [SA20339] Mandriva update for dia Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-31 Mandriva has issued an update for dia. This fixes some vulnerabilities, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20339/ -- [SA20338] Debian update for kernel-source-2.4.17 Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of system information, Exposure of sensitive information, Privilege escalation, DoS, System access Released: 2006-05-31 Debian has issued an update for kernel-source-2.4.17. This fixes some vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain knowledge of sensitive information, cause a DoS (Denial of Service), gain escalated privileges, and by malicious people to cause a DoS, and disclose potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20338/ -- [SA20326] Debian update for libextractor Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS, System access Released: 2006-05-29 Debian has issued an update for libextractor. This fixes two vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) and potentially compromise an application that uses the library. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20326/ -- [SA20323] Open-Xchange Default Account Password Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-05-29 Cemil Degirmenci has reported a security issue in Open-Xchange, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20323/ -- [SA20314] Ubuntu update for postgresql Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-30 Ubuntu has issued an update for postgresql. This fixes two vulnerabilities, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20314/ -- [SA20284] Pre News Manager Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported some vulnerabilities in Pre News Manager, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks and SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20284/ -- [SA20381] UnixWare update for MySQL Critical: Moderately critical Where: From local network Impact: System access Released: 2006-06-01 SCO has issued an update for MySQL. This fixes a vulnerability, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20381/ -- [SA20283] Debian update for awstats Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass, System access Released: 2006-05-26 Debian has issued an update for awstats. This fixes a security issue, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20283/ -- [SA20396] SUSE update for rug Critical: Less critical Where: From local network Impact: Security Bypass, Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-06-01 SUSE has issued an update for rug. This fixes a security issue and a weakness, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to disclose certain sensitive information and potentially by malicious people to bypass security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20396/ -- [SA20389] FreeBSD ypserv Inoperative Access Controls Security Issue Critical: Less critical Where: From local network Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-06-01 A security issue has been reported in FreeBSD, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20389/ -- [SA20333] Debian update for mysql-dfsg Critical: Less critical Where: From local network Impact: Security Bypass, Exposure of sensitive information, System access Released: 2006-05-29 Debian has issued an update for mysql-dfsg. This fixes some vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by malicious users to bypass certain security restrictions, disclose potentially sensitive information, and compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20333/ -- [SA20302] OpenOBEX ircp File Overwrite Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From local network Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 Jeroen van Wolffelaar has reported a vulnerability in Open OBEX, which can be exploited by malicious people to manipulate certain data on a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20302/ -- [SA20390] FreeBSD SMBFS chroot Directory Traversal Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-06-01 A vulnerability has been reported in FreeBSD, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20390/ -- [SA20388] SUSE update for vixie-cron Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-06-01 SUSE has issued an update for vixie-cron. This fixes a security issue, which potentially can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions with escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20388/ -- [SA20380] Vixie Cron "do_command.c" setuid Security Issue Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-06-01 Roman Veretelnikov has reported a security issue in Vixie Cron, which potentially can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions with escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20380/ -- [SA20370] Shadow "useradd.c" Insecure Mailbox File Permissions Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-31 A security issue has been reported in Shadow, which potentially can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions with escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20370/ -- [SA20368] Debian update for motor Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-31 Debian has issued an update for motor. This fixes a vulnerability, which potentially can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions with escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20368/ -- [SA20332] Avaya PDS Software Distributor Privilege Escalation Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-29 Avaya has acknowledged a vulnerability in Avaya Predictive Dialing System (PDS), which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20332/ -- [SA20329] Motor ktools VGETSTRING Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-31 A vulnerability has been reported in Motor, which potentially can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions with escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20329/ -- [SA20325] AIX lsmcode Unspecified Privilege Escalation Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-29 A vulnerability has been reported in AIX, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20325/ -- [SA20312] SUSE update for foomatic-filters Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Privilege escalation Released: 2006-05-30 SUSE has issued an update for foomatic-filters. This fixes a vulnerability, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated privileges. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20312/ -- [SA20369] xine-lib HTTP Response Heap Corruption Weakness Critical: Not critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS Released: 2006-05-31 Federico L. Bossi Bonin has discovered a weakness in xine-lib, which can be exploited by malicious people to crash certain applications on a user's system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20369/ -- [SA20330] Debian update for tiff Critical: Not critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS Released: 2006-05-29 Debian has issued an update for tiff. This fixes a vulnerability, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20330/ -- [SA20315] Debian update for dovecot Critical: Not critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-29 Debian has issued an update for dovecot. This fixes a weakness, which can be exploited by malicious users to gain knowledge of potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20315/ -- [SA20308] Dovecot "LIST" Command Directory Traversal Weakness Critical: Not critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-29 A weakness has been reported in Dovecot, which can be exploited by malicious users to gain knowledge of potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20308/ -- [SA20349] Linux Kernel SMP "/proc" Race Condition Denial of Service Critical: Not critical Where: Local system Impact: DoS Released: 2006-05-31 Tony Griffiths has reported a vulnerability in the Linux Kernel, which can be exploited malicious, local users to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20349/ -- [SA20337] PHP "curl_init()" Safe Mode Bypass Weakness Critical: Not critical Where: Local system Impact: Security Bypass Released: 2006-05-30 Maksymilian Arciemowicz has discovered a weakness in PHP, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to bypass certain security restrictions. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20337/ Other:-- [SA20378] Secure Elements Class 5 AVR Multiple Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From local network Impact: Security Bypass, Spoofing, Exposure of system information, Exposure of sensitive information, DoS, System access Released: 2006-05-31 Multiple vulnerabilities and security issues have been reported in Secure Elements Class 5 AVR, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose potentially sensitive information, bypass certain security restrictions, spoof the contents of messages, cause a DoS (Denial of Service) and potentially to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20378/ -- [SA20343] D-Link Airspot DSA-3100 Gateway "uname" Cross-Site Scripting Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 jaime.blasco has reported a vulnerability in D-Link Airspot DSA-3100 Gateway, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20343/ -- [SA20288] Novell Netware abend.log User Credentials Disclosure Critical: Less critical Where: Local system Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-26 A security issue has been reported in Novell Netware, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain knowledge of sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20288/ -- [SA20377] Secure Elements Class 5 AVR Message Encryption Security Issue Critical: Not critical Where: From local network Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-31 A security issue has been reported in Secure Elements Class 5 AVR, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to disclose certain sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20377/ Cross Platform:-- [SA20404] METAjour "system_path" Parameter File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-06-01 Kacper has discovered some vulnerabilities in METAjour, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20404/ -- [SA20399] Ottoman "default_path" File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-06-01 Kacper has discovered some vulnerabilities in Ottoman, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20399/ -- [SA20373] phpMyDesktop|arcade Local File Inclusion and Script Insertion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information, System access, Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-31 darkgod has discovered two vulnerabilities in phpMyDesktop|arcade, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion attacks, disclose sensitive information, and compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20373/ -- [SA20364] IBM DCE Two Kerberos Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: DoS, System access Released: 2006-06-01 IBM has acknowledged two vulnerabilities in IBM DCE, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) or potentially compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20364/ -- [SA20358] F at cile Interactive Web Multiple Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, System access Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported some vulnerabilities in F at cile Interactive Web, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, disclose sensitive information, and compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20358/ -- [SA20356] tinyBB SQL Injection and File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data, System access Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has discovered some vulnerabilities in tinyBB, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks and to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20356/ -- [SA20354] phpBB Activity Mod Plus Module "phpbb_root_path" File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-30 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported a vulnerability in the Activity Mod Plus module for phpBB, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20354/ -- [SA20353] UBB.threads Cross-Site Scripting and File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, System access Released: 2006-05-30 Mustafa Can Bjorn has discovered some vulnerabilities in UBB.threads, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks and compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20353/ -- [SA20350] phpBB Blend Portal System Module "phpbb_root_path" File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-30 Mustafa Can Bjorn has reported a vulnerability in the Blend Portal System module for phpBB, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20350/ -- [SA20346] Fastpublish CMS "config[fsBase]" File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-30 Kacper has reported some vulnerabilities in Fastpublish CMS, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20346/ -- [SA20331] Hot Open Tickets "CLASS_PATH" Parameter File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-29 Kacper has discovered a vulnerability in Hot Open Tickets, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20331/ -- [SA20310] Plume CMS "/manager/frontinc/prepend.php" File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-29 beford has discovered a vulnerability in Plume CMS, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20310/ -- [SA20301] open-medium.CMS "404.php" File Inclusion Vulnerability Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 Kacper has discovered a vulnerability in the open-medium.CMS, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20301/ -- [SA20300] Basic Analysis and Security Engine "BASE_path" File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 str0ke has discovered some vulnerabilities in Basic Analysis and Security Engine, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20300/ -- [SA20299] ActionApps "GLOBALS[AA_INC_PATH]" File Inclusion Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 Kacper has discovered some vulnerabilities in ActionApps, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20299/ -- [SA20298] DoceboLMS "lang" Parameter File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 beford has discovered some vulnerabilities in DoceboLMS, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20298/ -- [SA20292] Back-End CMS "_PSL[classdir]" File Inclusion Vulnerability Critical: Highly critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 Kacper has discovered a vulnerability in Back-End CMS, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20292/ -- [SA20375] pppBLOG "files[0]" Parameter Disclosure of Sensitive Information Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-06-01 rgod has discovered a vulnerability in pppBLOG, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20375/ -- [SA20367] WebCalendar "includedir" Parameter Arbitrary Setting File Loading Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Security Bypass, Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-31 socsam has discovered a vulnerability in WebCalendar, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions and disclose sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20367/ -- [SA20366] WikiNi Script Insertion Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-30 Raphael Huck has discovered some vulnerabilities in WikiNi, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20366/ -- [SA20359] phpBB Nivisec Hacks List Module Local File Inclusion Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has discovered a vulnerability in the Nivisec Hacks List module for phpBB, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20359/ -- [SA20352] Eggblog posts.php SQL Injection Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-29 Mustafa Can Bjorn has discovered a vulnerability in Eggblog, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20352/ -- [SA20351] aMule Information Disclosure Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Exposure of system information, Exposure of sensitive information Released: 2006-05-29 A vulnerability has been reported in aMule, which can be exploited by malicious people and by malicious users to disclose potentially sensitive information. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20351/ -- [SA20316] Geeklog Multiple Vulnerabilities and Weaknesses Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data, Exposure of system information Released: 2006-05-30 trueend5 has reported some vulnerabilities and weaknesses in Geeklog, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose system information, and conduct cross-site scripting and SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20316/ -- [SA20307] Seditio "Referer" HTTP Header Script Insertion Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Yunus Emre Yilmaz has discovered a vulnerability in Seditio, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20307/ -- [SA20304] ByteHoard File Copy and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-29 Nomenumbra has discovered two vulnerabilities in ByteHoard, which can be exploited by malicious people to manipulate sensitive information and conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20304/ -- [SA20303] MailManager PostgreSQL Encoding-Based SQL Injection Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 A vulnerability has been reported in MailManager, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20303/ -- [SA20297] V-webmail "CONFIG[pear_dir]" File Inclusion Vulnerability Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-26 beford has discovered a vulnerability in V-webmail, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20297/ -- [SA20295] Pre Shopping Mall SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported some vulnerabilities in Pre Shopping Mall, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20295/ -- [SA20290] ChatPat Script Insertion and SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported two vulnerabilities in ChatPat, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion and SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20290/ -- [SA20287] iFdate Cross-Site Scripting and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported some vulnerabilities in iFdate, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting and script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20287/ -- [SA20286] Realty Pro One Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection Critical: Moderately critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported some vulnerabilities in Realty Pro One, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting and SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20286/ -- [SA20363] XiTi Tracking Script "xiti.js" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-31 Yannick Daffaud has reported two vulnerabilities in the XiTi Tracking Script, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20363/ -- [SA20341] Open Searchable Image Catalogue SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting, Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-31 Nenad Jovanovic has discovered some vulnerabilities in Open Searchable Image Catalogue, which can be exploited by malicious users to conduct SQL injection attacks and by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20341/ -- [SA20340] DGNews "upprocess.php" File Upload Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: System access Released: 2006-05-30 r0t has discovered a vulnerability in DGNews, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise a vulnerable system. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20340/ -- [SA20336] Photoalbum B&W "index.php" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-30 black-code and sweet-devil have discovered some vulnerabilities in Photoalbum B&W, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20336/ -- [SA20334] TikiWiki Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Blwood has discovered some vulnerabilities in TikiWiki, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20334/ -- [SA20327] Achievo "atkselector" Parameter SQL Injection Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Manipulation of data Released: 2006-05-30 Christian Nancy has reported a vulnerability in Achievo, which can be exploited by malicious users to conduct SQL injection attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20327/ -- [SA20324] Vacation Rental Script "obj" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 luny has discovered a vulnerability in Vacation Rental Script, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20324/ -- [SA20322] Pretty Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 luny has discovered a vulnerability in Pretty Guestbook, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20322/ -- [SA20321] Smile Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 luny has discovered a vulnerability in Smile Guestbook, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20321/ -- [SA20320] Morris Guestbook "pagina" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 luny has discovered a vulnerability in Morris Guestbook, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20320/ -- [SA20311] php-residence Multiple Script Insertion Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Nomenumbra has reported some vulnerabilities in php-residence, which can be exploited by malicious users to conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20311/ -- [SA20306] PHPSimpleChoose Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 luny has discovered a vulnerability in PHPSimpleChoose, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20306/ -- [SA20305] PHP-AGTC membership system "useremail" Script Insertion Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Nomenumbra has discovered a vulnerability in PHP-AGTC membership system, which can be exploited by malicious users to conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20305/ -- [SA20296] CMS Mundo "searchstring" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported a vulnerability in CMS Mundo, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20296/ -- [SA20293] phpESP ADOdb Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Some vulnerabilities have been reported in phpESP, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20293/ -- [SA20291] AZ Photo Album Script Pro Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported a vulnerability in AZ Photo Album Script Pro, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20291/ -- [SA20289] Elite-Board "search" Parameter Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported a vulnerability in Elite-Board, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20289/ -- [SA20285] Assetman Unspecified Script Insertion Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-29 Nomenumbra has reported some vulnerabilities in Assetman, which can be exploited by malicious users to conduct script insertion attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20285/ -- [SA20282] iFlance Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Critical: Less critical Where: From remote Impact: Cross Site Scripting Released: 2006-05-26 luny has reported some vulnerabilities in iFlance, which can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. Full Advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/20282/ ======================================================================== Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive, by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor. Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/ Subscribe: http://secunia.com/secunia_weekly_summary/ Contact details: Web : http://secunia.com/ E-mail : support at secunia.com Tel : +45 70 20 51 44 Fax : +45 70 20 51 45 From isn at c4i.org Mon Jun 5 04:26:44 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:26:44 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] HP printer drivers hit with Funlove virus Message-ID: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9000907 By Robert McMillan IDG News Service June 02, 2006 Hewlett-Packard Co. on Thursday pulled a printer driver from its Web site after security vendor BitDefender reported that the software was infected with the same computer virus that infected HP's drivers more than five years ago. A BitDefender partner notified the security vendor of the infected driver software on Wednesday, and the company's security researchers soon determined that it had the same Funlove virus that had plagued HP in December 2000. BitDefender notified HP of the problem on Wednesday, and the infected printer driver was removed from HP's Web site early Thursday, said BitDefender spokesman Vitor Souza. Until then, the virus was being distributed with the Korean version of the Windows 95/98 driver for HP's Officejet g85 All-in-One printer. HP no longer sells the all-in-one printer, and the current antivirus products are able to block it. So while the oversight is an embarrassment for HP, it's unlikely that many users were affected by Funlove. Previously, HP had inadvertently distributed the Funlove virus in Japanese printer drivers that were made available on the company's Web site. Souza believes that HP most likely neglected to remove this particular infected driver back in 2000. "Its just like nobody had run a test against antivirus [software]," he said. Even for users who fall prey to the virus, the consequences are not severe. When it gets installed, the Funlove pops up a text message that reads "Fun Loving Criminal," and then attempts to reboot the PC. On Windows NT machines, it attempts to change system settings so that files that can normally be seen only by administrators are visible to all. HP executives were not immediately available to comment for this story. BitDefender is owned by Softwin SRL, based in Bucharest, Romania. From isn at c4i.org Mon Jun 5 04:26:21 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:26:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] PaineWebber Systems Admin Faces Trial For Computer Sabotage Message-ID: http://www.informationweek.com/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=188700855 By Sharon Gaudin InformationWeek Jun 1, 2006 A former systems administrator for financial giant UBS PaineWebber goes on trial Tuesday for allegedly sabotaging two-thirds of the company's computer network in what prosecutors say was a vengeful attempt to profit from a crashing stock price. Roger Duronio, 63, of Bogota, N.J., is facing federal charges in front of a U.S. District Court in Newark, in connection to the creation and planting of malicious code on more than 1,000 computers in the company's central office, as well as in approximately 370 branch offices. When the malicious code, or "logic bomb," was triggered on March 4, 2002, it began deleting files and data, taking down many PaineWebber computers across the United States and hindering trading for days in some branch offices and for several weeks in others, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Mauro Wolfe, lead prosecutor on the case. The attack, according to the indictment, cost UBS PaineWebber, which was renamed UBS Wealth Management USA in 2003, $3 million just to assess and repair the damage. The company didn't submit a list of losses to the government based on business downtime or lost trading opportunities. Chris Adams, Duronio's defense attorney and a partner at Walder Hayden & Brogan in Roseland, N.J., says the government has the wrong man. Duronio has pleaded not guilty to all charges. He has been free on bail awaiting trial for the past four years. Adams says he's not working in an IT position at this time. According to Wolfe, Duronio is facing four counts--one count of computer intrusion, one count of mail fraud, and two counts of securities fraud. The government contends that Duronio tried to profit from the attack by manipulating the stock price of the global investment banking and securities firm with the attack on its network. The government contends that in the months leading up to the planting of the logic bomb and the subsequent attack, Duronio, using the U.S. postal system, bought more than $21,000 worth of 'put option' contracts for PaineWebber's parent company, UBS, A.G.'s stock. A put option is a type of stock that actually increases in value when the stock price drops. According to Wolfe, Duronio was betting the attack would cripple the company's network, and its stock would fall in the aftermath, allowing him to cash in. Because of this part of his alleged plan, Duronio is being charged with mail and securities fraud. ''Computers across the country pretty much all went down at once,'' says Wolfe. ''System administrators started to receive phone calls that morning that certain computers weren't working. Within minutes, it escalated from one phone call to 10, 60, 70... over 100 phone calls. At or about 10 o'clock they realized it wasn't an isolated issue but all the computers across the network. It was just too much of a coincidence for that to happen... This [network] was designed so everything would not crash at once. The same network designed to not suffer that problem was suffering that exact problem.'' And Wolfe says the man who was responsible for keeping that exact system up and running for three years was the one who ultimately took it down. ''The defendant was motivated by the fact that he was a disgruntled employee who was not happy with his salary,'' says Wolfe. ''He wanted an annual salary of $175,000 guaranteed. And I think for the year 2001 he was paid about $13,000 less than that.'' Insider Attacks Attacks by corporate insiders, even by IT professionals, is not an uncommon problem, according to last year's CSI/FBI Computer Crime Survey. With only slight variation from year to year, inside jobs occur as frequently as the highly publicized outside hacker attacks. Insider abuse, according to the survey, cost U.S. companies $6,856,450 last year. ''Insider attacks are definitely more dangerous,'' says Eric Maiwald, a senior analyst for Burton Group, a research and consulting firm based in Midvale, Utah. ''The average outside person generally doesn't have access to your systems. Their first job in attacking you is to get access, whereas the insider starts out with access. They're starting one step ahead of the game. You have some general expectation that they're not trying to cause you harm.'' John O'Leary, director of education at the San Francisco-based Computer Security Institute, says companies have more to fear from insiders in general because they know where the weak points in the network are, and where the critical information is stored. But he adds that executives have far more to fear from IT workers, because they not only know how to get to the information but have the tools and the access rights to do it easily. ''It's easy [to do] because we give our techs a lot of trust, but it's difficult because we generally put compensating controls in place,'' says O'Leary. ''Other [people] need to edit what these guys are doing. Someone needs to see what changes he made. If he could make changes without somebody noticing, then something is wrong.'' Maiwald, though, says it's exceedingly difficult for companies to put in enough processes and controls to completely shut down someone with system administrator-level authority and access. ''It's only the trusted individuals who can betray you at that level," says Maiwald. ''If someone is digging ditches for you, they don't have a lot of power. But your system administrator has a lot of power because it's part of the job. If you put too many controls on them, they can't do their jobs... There are controls that can be put in place to do such things but they require a company to be very watchful, along with additional staff, [and] specific procedures. And it's just not very easy to do that.'' The Duronio Case In this case, the government alleges that Duronio was a trusted employee - one with great access and authority -- who used that against PaineWebber. The charge of computer intrusion is based on the government's allegations that Duronio built the code for the logic bomb, installed it on Unix machines in PaineWebber's central office in Weehawkin, N.J., and then pushed it out to about 1,000 computers across the company's national network. Wolfe says the malicious code was planted ''from coast to coast." The logic bomb, which was made up of only 50 to 70 lines of code, was built to delete every file on the system, according to the prosecution. Duronio, who quit his job at PaineWebber a few weeks before the bomb went off, also allegedly planted the code on the system's backup servers so that when IT workers tried to restore operations using backup tapes, those files were deleted as well. The bomb was designed to go off every Monday at 9:30 a.m. - just as the stock market opened - in March, April and May of 2002. Trading, the lifeblood of the company, was interrupted because of the crippled network. PaineWebber reported to the government that trading was hindered for a few days in larger locations, and for as long as a few weeks in some branch offices. According to the prosecution, 350 IBM support personnel were brought in to aid with the nationwide recovery effort. ''Could they trade? Yes. Could they trade the way they normally traded? No,'' says Wolfe. ''Normally... the broker would sit at his desk and go online and trade for you... If the client didn't know what the balance of their account was, they couldn't trade for them.'' The government also contends that Duronio planted the code piecemeal during the previous November and December from a remote location. Wolfe says records show that Duronio's password and user account information were used to gain remote access to the areas where the malicious code was built inside the PaineWebber network. The U.S. Secret Service, which is frequently called in to conduct criminal investigations and specifically cyber crime, executed a warrant on March 21, 2002, and allegedly found hard copy of the logic bomb's source code on the defendant's bedroom dresser. They also allegedly found the source code on two of his four home computers. ''The defendant used the information of the impending logic bomb attack,'' says Wolfe. ''He purchased securities. He bet against the company that the company stock would drop... He engaged in an artifice or scheme to fraud investors.'' Computer sabotage is a federal offense if it affects a computer used in interstate commerce and causes more than $5,000 worth of damage to the company over a 12-month span. Duronio faces a maximim sentence of 30 years, fines of up to $1 million and restitution for the $3.2 million PaineWebber spent on recovery. From isn at c4i.org Mon Jun 5 04:26:32 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:26:32 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Swedish police probe site crash Message-ID: http://news.com.com/Swedish+police+probe+site+crash/2100-7349_3-6079740.html By Reuters June 4, 2006 Sweden's domestic intelligence agency said it would probe why the government's Web site crashed on Sunday amid reports hackers had sought revenge for a crackdown on alleged online piracy. The government Web site went off line in the early hours of Sunday. The Internet home page of the national police crashed in similar fashion on Thursday. The police Web site problem came a day after the Pirate Bay Internet page, which the recording industry calls a major source for downloading pirated music and films, was shut by police. "They (the government) contacted us and wanted to make a police complaint that something has happened with their home page and it is now a question for us investigate if it is a crime or something else," said Anders Thornberg, a spokesman for the Security Police intelligence agency. Local media said hackers attacked both sites, now functioning again, after the clampdown on Pirate Bay. Pirate Bay is also up and running again. Sweden's Emergency Management Agency earlier warned all 31 bodies involved in emergency management, such as the police and rescue services, and all 21 local authorities to ensure they were safe from attacks on their Web sites. Newspaper Aftonbladet quoted a group called World Wide Hackers as saying they had arranged an attack on the government's Web site. Sweden last year banned the downloading of copyright protected music and movies from the Internet after being singled out for criticism by Hollywood. The raid on Pirate Bay was the latest of several actions against suspected online piracy. Critics say the police are heavy handed and that people should have access to free information via the Internet, including file sharing. Several hundred people demonstrated in Stockholm on Saturday in support of Pirate Bay. Story Copyright ? 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. From isn at c4i.org Mon Jun 5 04:26:55 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:26:55 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] DISA seeks input on insider threat tools Message-ID: http://www.fcw.com/article94741-06-02-06-Web By Bob Brewin June 2, 2006 The Defense Information Systems Agency wants industry input on tools that could counter insider threats to Defense Department information systems. DISA said traditional efforts to secure networks focus on outside threats, but insiders pose an equally damaging threat. And they can access DOD networks without detection by the security systems. DISA, in a request for information released June 1 [1], said it is looking for an insider threat focused observation tool that could be deployed on selected host DOD machines to aggressively gather and analyze data on inside threats. DISA said the insider threat tools would enhance the network security of DOD information systems. The agency would install the host machines on network end points and could be servers, desktop PCs or laptop PCs equipped with agent-based tools that can monitor insider network activity. The tool would collect data such as user IDs, computer type and the processes - e-mail clients, Web browsers, office management tools, database access - that monitored computers run. DISA said it wants tools that can then conduct user analysis on the collected data and warn of anomalies based on user profiles and behavior patterns. DISA envisions that the host machines would connect to a central manager that can handle as many as 250 hosts at a time, with hosts located within an enclave, such as local-area or base network. The insider threat tools should also include a console, which is the central display and action point for collected user data and will provide the operator with real-time insight into user activity, the RFI states. DISA said it wants a tool capable of working with a wide range of operating systems including Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows NT4, Sun Microsystems Solaris, Unix and Linux. The due date for RFI responses is July 5. [1] http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DISA/D4AD/DITCO/RFI418/listing.html From isn at c4i.org Mon Jun 5 04:27:12 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:27:12 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] BACK TO THE BUNKER Message-ID: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060201410.html By William M. Arkin The Washington Post June 4, 2006 On Monday, June 19, about 4,000 government workers representing more than 50 federal agencies from the State Department to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will say goodbye to their families and set off for dozens of classified emergency facilities stretching from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs to the foothills of the Alleghenies. They will take to the bunkers in an "evacuation" that my sources describe as the largest "continuity of government" exercise ever conducted, a drill intended to prepare the U.S. government for an event even more catastrophic than the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The exercise is the latest manifestation of an obsession with government survival that has been a hallmark of the Bush administration since 9/11, a focus of enormous and often absurd time, money and effort that has come to echo the worst follies of the Cold War. The vast secret operation has updated the duck-and-cover scenarios of the 1950s with state-of-the-art technology -- alerts and updates delivered by pager and PDA, wireless priority service, video teleconferencing, remote backups -- to ensure that "essential" government functions continue undisrupted should a terrorist's nuclear bomb go off in downtown Washington. But for all the BlackBerry culture, the outcome is still old-fashioned black and white: We've spent hundreds of millions of dollars on alternate facilities, data warehouses and communications, yet no one can really foretell what would happen to the leadership and functioning of the federal government in a catastrophe. After 9/11, The Washington Post reported that President Bush had set up a shadow government of about 100 senior civilian managers to live and work outside Washington on a rotating basis to ensure the continuity of national security. Since then, a program once focused on presidential succession and civilian control of U.S. nuclear weapons has been expanded to encompass the entire government. From the Department of Education to the Small Business Administration to the National Archives, every department and agency is now required to plan for continuity outside Washington. Yet according to scores of documents I've obtained and interviews with half a dozen sources, there's no greater confidence today that essential services would be maintained in a disaster. And no one really knows how an evacuation would even be physically possible. Moreover, since 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, the definition of what constitutes an "essential" government function has been expanded so ridiculously beyond core national security functions -- do we really need patent and trademark processing in the middle of a nuclear holocaust? -- that the term has become meaningless. The intent of the government effort may be laudable, even necessary, but a hyper-centralized approach based on the Cold War model of evacuations and bunkering makes it practically worthless. That the continuity program is so poorly conceived, and poorly run, should come as no surprise. That's because the same Federal Emergency Management Agency that failed New Orleans after Katrina, an agency that a Senate investigating committee has pronounced "in shambles and beyond repair," is in charge of this enormous effort to plan for the U.S. government's survival. Continuity programs began in the early 1950s, when the threat of nuclear war moved the administration of President Harry S. Truman to begin planning for emergency government functions and civil defense. Evacuation bunkers were built, and an incredibly complex and secretive shadow government program was created. At its height, the grand era of continuity boasted the fully operational Mount Weather, a civilian bunker built along the crest of Virginia's Blue Ridge, to which most agency heads would evacuate; the Greenbrier hotel complex and bunker in West Virginia, where Congress would shelter; and Raven Rock, or Site R, a national security bunker bored into granite along the Pennsylvania-Maryland border near Camp David, where the Joint Chiefs of Staff would command a protracted nuclear war. Special communications networks were built, and evacuation and succession procedures were practiced continually. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the program became a Cold War curiosity: Then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney ordered Raven Rock into caretaker status in 1991. The Greenbrier bunker was shuttered and a 30-year-old special access program was declassified three years later. Then came the terrorist attacks of the mid-1990s and the looming Y2K rollover, and suddenly continuity wasn't only for nuclear war anymore. On Oct. 21, 1998, President Bill Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 67, "Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations." No longer would only the very few elite leaders responsible for national security be covered. Instead, every single government department and agency was directed to see to it that they could resume critical functions within 12 hours of a warning, and keep their operations running at emergency facilities for up to 30 days. FEMA was put in charge of this broad new program. On 9/11, the program was put to the test -- and failed. Not on the national security side: Vice President Cheney and others in the national security leadership were smoothly whisked away from the capital following procedures overseen by the Pentagon and the White House Military Office. But like the mass of Washingtonians, officials from other agencies found themselves virtually on their own, unsure of where to go or what to do, or whom to contact for the answers. In the aftermath, the federal government was told to reinvigorate its continuity efforts. Bush approved lines of succession for civil agencies. Cabinet departments and agencies were assigned specific emergency responsibilities. FEMA issued new preparedness guidelines and oversaw training. A National Capital Region continuity working group established in 1999, comprising six White House groups, 15 departments and 61 agencies, met to coordinate. But all the frenetic activity did not produce a government prepared for the worst. A year after 9/11, and almost three years after the deadline set in Clinton's 1998 directive, the Government Accounting Office evaluated 38 agencies and found that not one had addressed all the issues it had been ordered to. A 2004 GAO audit of 34 government continuity-of-operations plans found total confusion on the question of essential functions. One unnamed organization listed 399 such functions. A department included providing "speeches and articles for the Secretary and Deputy Secretary" among its essential duties, while neglecting many of its central programs. The confusion and absurdity have continued, according to documents I've collected over the past few years. In June 2004, FEMA told federal agencies that essential services in a catastrophe would include not only such obvious ones as electric power generation and disaster relief but also patent and trademark processing, student aid and passport processing. A month earlier, FEMA had told states and local communities that library services should be counted as essential along with fire protection and law enforcement. None of this can be heartening to Americans who want to believe that in a crisis, their government can distinguish between what is truly essential and what isn't -- and provide it. Just two years ago, an exercise called Forward Challenge '04 pointed up the danger of making everyone and everything essential: Barely an hour after agencies were due to arrive at their relocation sites, the Office of Management and Budget asked the reconstituted government to identify emergency funding requirements. As one after-action report for the exercise later put it in a classic case of understatement: "It was not clear . . . whether this would be a realistic request at that stage of an emergency." This year's exercise, Forward Challenge '06, will be the third major interagency continuity exercise since 9/11. Larger than Forward Challenge '04 and the Pinnacle exercise held last year, it requires 31 departments and agencies (including FEMA) to relocate. Fifty to 60 are expected to take part. According to government sources, the exercise will test the newly created continuity of government alert conditions -- called COGCONs -- that emulate the DEFCONs of the national security community. Forward Challenge will begin with a series of alerts via BlackBerry and pager to key officials. It will test COGCON 1, the highest level of preparedness, in which each department and agency is required to have at least one person in its chain of command and sufficient staffing at alternate operating facilities to perform essential functions. Though key White House officials and military leadership would be relocated via the Pentagon's Joint Emergency Evacuation Program (JEEP), the civilians are on their own to make it to their designated evacuation points. But fear not: Each organization's COOP, or continuity of operations plan, details the best routes to the emergency locations. The plans even spell out what evacuees should take with them (recommended items: a combination lock, a flashlight, two towels and a small box of washing powder). Can such an exercise, announced well in advance, hope to re-create any of the tensions and fears of a real crisis? How do you simulate the experience of driving through blazing, radiated, panic-stricken streets to emergency bunker sites miles away? As the Energy Department stated in its review of Forward Challenge '04, "a method needs to be devised to realistically test the ability of . . . federal offices to relocate to their COOP sites using a scenario that simulates . . . the monumental challenges that would be involved in evacuating the city." With its new plans and procedures, Washington may think it has thought of everything to save itself. Forward Challenge will no doubt be deemed a success, and officials will pronounce the continuity-of-government project sound. There will be lessons to be learned that will justify more millions of dollars and more work in the infinite effort to guarantee order out of chaos. But the main defect -- a bunker mentality that considers too many people and too many jobs "essential" -- will remain unchallenged. -=- William M. Arkin writes the Early Warning blog for washingtonpost.com and is the author of "Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World" (Steerforth Press). ? 2006 The Washington Post Company From isn at c4i.org Tue Jun 6 06:03:36 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 05:03:36 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Spammer settles suit for $1 million Message-ID: http://news.com.com/2100-7348_3-6079868.html By Will Sturgeon Special to CNET News.com June 5, 2006 A major spammer who was accused of sending up to 25 million e-mails per day has settled a lawsuit with Microsoft and the state of Texas. The settlement has cost Ryan Pitylak $1 million, as well as the seizure of many of the assets he accumulated during a short-lived career as one of the world's worst spammers. At the peak of his spamming activity, the 24-year-old Texas resident was listed as the world's fourth most-prolific spammer by antispam group Spamhaus. Now Pitylak is claiming something of an epiphany, saying he has seen the error of his ways and will dedicate his efforts to trying to rid the world of nuisance e-mail. He has even taken to referring to himself as an "antispam activist" in an apparent change of heart of epic proportions. On Saturday, Pitylak wrote in his blog: "Over time I have come to see how I was wrong to think of spam as just a game of cat and mouse with corporate e-mail administrators. I now understand why so much effort is put into stopping it. The settlements with Microsoft and the Attorney General's Office have been a serious reality check: harsh but good, and in the public's best interest." He added: "I am pleased to announce that I am now a part of the anti-spam community, having started an Internet security company that offers my clients advice on systems to protect against spam. I'm now working earnestly to help other entrepreneurs avoid the traps that deceived me and led me to make questionable business choices." Will Sturgeon of Silicon.com reported from London. From isn at c4i.org Tue Jun 6 06:03:03 2006 From: isn at c4i.org (InfoSec News) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 05:03:03 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [ISN] Wal-Mart's data center remains mystery Message-ID: http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/local_story_148015054/ By Max McCoy The Joplin Globe Globe Investigative Writer May 28, 2006 JANE, Mo. - Call it Area 71. Behind a fence topped with razor wire just off U.S. Highway 71 is a bunker of a building that Wal-Mart considers so secret that it won't even let the county assessor inside without a nondisclosure agreement. The 125,000-square-foot building, tucked behind a new Wal-Mart Supercenter, is only a stone's throw from the Arkansas line and about 15 miles from corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Ark. There is nothing about the building to give even a hint that Wal-Mart owns it. Despite the glimpses through the fence of manicured grass and carefully placed trees, the overall impression is that this is a secure site that could withstand just about anything. Earth is packed against the sides. The green roof - meant, perhaps, to blend into the surrounding Ozarks hills - bristles with dish antennas. On one of the heavy steel gates at the guardhouse is a notice that visitors must use the intercom for assistance. What the building houses is a mystery. Speculation Wal-Mart's ability to crunch numbers is a favorite of conspiracy theorists, and its data centers are the corporate counterpart to Area 51 at Groom Lake in the state of Nevada. According to one consumer activist, Katherine Albrecht, even the wildest conspiracy buff might be surprised at just how much Wal-Mart knows about its customers - and how much more it would like to know. "We were contacted about two years ago by somebody who runs a security company that had been asked in a request for proposals for ways they could link video footage with customers paying for their purchases," Albrecht said. "Wal-Mart would actually be able to view photos and video of customers paying, say, for a pack of gum. At the time, it struck me as unbelievably outlandish because of the amount of data storage required." But Wal-Mart, according to a 2004 New York Times article, had enough storage capacity to contain twice the amount of all the information available on the Internet. For the technically minded, the exact amount was for 460 terabytes of data. The prefix tera comes from the Greek word for monster, and a terabyte is a trillion bytes, the basic unit of computer storage. Albrecht, founder of Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering, said she never could confirm the contractor's story. That is not surprising, since Wal-Mart seldom comments on its data capabilities and operations. A Globe request for information about the Jane data center was referred at Wal-Mart headquarters to Carrie Thum, a senior information officer and former lobbyist for the retailer. "This is not something that we discuss publicly," Thum said. "We have no comment. And that's off the record." Skeleton crew The Jane data center is an enigmatic icon to the power of data, which has helped Wal-Mart become the largest retailer in the world, and to the corporation's growing secrecy since founder Sam Walton's death in 1992. When Wal-Mart constructed its primary data center at corporate headquarters in 1989, it wasn't much of a secret: It was the largest poured concrete structure in Arkansas at the time, and Walton himself ordered a third story. "Not only had we completely designed it, we were under construction," said Bill Ferguson, a founder of Askew Nixon Ferguson Architects in Memphis, Tenn. "They were pouring foundations, and Sam walked across the parking lot one Friday at the end of the day and said, 'You know, let's add a third floor and put some people up there.'" Ferguson said the Bentonville data center is built on bedrock and is designed to withstand most natural and man-made disasters, but is not impregnable. The biggest danger, he said, is the area's frequently violent thunderstorms. "We studied making it tornado-proof, which is difficult," he said. "We calculated the probability of a category 5 tornado hitting it, which was less likely than an airplane crashing into it head-on. At the time, they decided not to." Since then, Ferguson said, changes have been made to increase the integrity of the structure. The data center was designed with backup generators, fuel on site, and room and board for a skeleton crew in the event an emergency required an extended stay. Ferguson said his firm learned to design data centers by working with FedEx, which also is based in Memphis, and that the 1989 Wal-Mart data center was built so that it could communicate via any means available - including copper wire, fiber optics and satellites. The firm no longer works with Wal-Mart, and Ferguson said he had no knowledge of the design or purpose of the data center in Jane. But he suggested that Jim Liles, a Memphis engineer, might know. Liles said he was a consultant on the Jane project, and that Crossland Construction was the contractor, but he was reluctant to say much else. "As far as what its purpose is, all that has to come from Wal-Mart," Liles said. Crossland Construction, based in Columbus, Kan., said Tim Oelke of the company's Rogers, Ark., office had been in charge. Oelke did not return a phone call seeking comment. 'Never saw a plan' The data center was completed in 2004 and was part of a project that included the Supercenter, which opened early last year, and a warehouse. The resulting economic impact on McDonald County, known for its rolling hills and lazy rivers, is difficult to underestimate, said Rusty Enlow. "Just a few years ago, one new store would have been a big deal," Enlow said. "And I'm not talking about a Supercenter. Just a gas station would have generated excitement." Now, Enlow said, the county's tax base has doubled, and land is going for about $2,100 an acre, about twice what it was before the project was announced in 2001. Enlow is chairman of the county planning commission, a body created by popular vote in 1964 but which had not met until this month. Enlow said he doesn't know why the commission never met, but he believes it was because whatever problem prompted its creation was solved before the board was appointed. He also said he's not sure the planning commission has any real authority, or would want any (there is no zoning in the county), but that he and the other 18 members are eager to bring even more business into the county. "It seems with the opening of that store there has just been a lot of activity," he said. "McDonald County has always been a poor county, but we are in an excellent position now. We're a friendly place, and we're open to things." Wal-Mart, Enlow said, had created a business synergy that was helping the county of 22,000 shed its hillbilly stereotype. Enlow was director of the McDonald County Economic Development Council when Wal-Mart quietly began scouting for land. Only after the land had been bought south of the then-unincorporated community of Jane was it announced that the project was Wal-Mart's, and even then, plans for the data center were closely held. "I never even saw a plan on it," Enlow said. But Enlow said he watched during the construction of the data center, and that it appeared to be a single-story building that was built "like a bunker," with mounds of earth piled against the sides. He later was told that it would employ 15 to 20 people, and that the building was for data storage. To facilitate the project, the Missouri Department of Transportation agreed to widen Highway 71 to four lanes from Jane to the Arkansas line; a grant was used to expand the public water district; and the Army Corps of Engineers approved a request to fill in a small portion of wetland along Bear Hollow Road. Meanwhile, the village of Jane incorporated. In April 2005, Wal-Mart used the 160,000-square-foot Supercenter to demonstrate its micro-merchandising capabilities as part of a media conference. Employees demonstrated hand-held Telxon (pronounced Tel-zon) computers, which resemble hand scanners but hold a year's worth of a particular store's sales history on every item. The devices help store managers decide what to stock. Bananas are Wal-Mart's best-selling produce product nationwide, but at Jane, the top seller was lettuce, Supermarket News reported after the event. 'Secretive' Bill Wilson, McDonald County presiding commissioner, said he has never been inside the green-roofed data center, and that to his knowledge, only one county official has: Assessor Laura Pope. "I had