Hawaii Webmasters
Hacked By
Doctor Nuker

Founder Pakistan Hackerz Club
doctornuker@puckoff.com
 

KASHMIR ISSUE IN A NUTSHELL

 The current agitation in Indian-Held Kashmir is rooted in
the struggle of the people for the exercise of the right of
      self-determination. Peaceful processions chanting
demands for freedom were fired upon by Indian Army
and Police. Hundreds of men, women and children have
been killed or wounded. 
New Delhi's allegations of assistance to the Kashmiri
people from the Pakistan side are unfounded. Objective
reports in foreign media testify that the Kashmiri
agitation is indigenous. 
Pakistan upholds the right of the people of Jammu and
Kashmir to self-determination in accordance with the
resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.
These resolutions of 1948 and 1949 provide for the
holding of a free and impartial plebiscite for the
determination of the future of the State by the people of
Jammu and Kashmir. 
The basic points about the UN resolutions are that : 
(i) the complaint relating to Kashmir was initiated by India
in the Security Council ; (ii) the Council explicitly and by
implication, rejected India's claim that Kashmir is legally
Indian territory; (iii) the resolutions established
self-determination as the governing principle for the
settlement of the Kashmir dispute. This is the world
body's commitment to the people of Kashmir ; (iv) the
resolutions endorsed a binding agreement between
India and Pakistan reached through the mediation of
UNCIP, that a plebiscite would be held, under agreed
and specified conditions. 
The Security Council has rejected the Indian contention
that the people of Kashmir have exercised their right of
self-determination by participating in the "elections"
which India has from time to time organised in the Held
Kashmir. The 0.2% turn out during the 1989 "elections"
was the most recent clear repudiation of the Indian
claim. 
Pakistan continues to adhere to the UN resolutions.
These are binding also on India. 
The Simla Agreement of 2 July 1972, to which Pakistan
also continues to adhere, did not alter the status of
Jammu and Kashmir as a disputed territory: 
Para 6 of the Agreement lists "a final settlement of
Jammu and Kashmir" as one of the outstanding
questions awaiting a settlement. 
Para 4 (ii) talks of a "Line of Control" as
distinguished from an international border.
Furthermore, it explicitly protects "the recognised
position of either side," The recognised position of
Pakistan is the one which is recognised by the
United Nations and the World Community in
general. 
Article I (iv) obviously refers to the Kashmir issue
when it talks of "the basic issues and causes of
conflict which have bedevilled the relations
between the two countries for the last 25 years. 
The Simla Agreement does not preclude raising of
Kashmir issue at the United Nations: 
Para I (I) specifically provides that the UN Charter
"shall govern" relations between the parties. 
Para I (ii) providing for settlement of differences by
peaceful means, does not exclude resort to the
means of pacific settlement of disputes and
differences provided in the UN Charter. 
The UN Security Council remains seized of the Kashmir
issue which ermines onf the Council's agenda. 
Articles 34 and 35 of the UN Charter specifically
empower the Security Council to investigate any dispute
independently or at the request of a member State.
These provisions cannot be made subservient to any
bilateral agreement. 
According to Article 103 of the UN Charter, member
States obligations under the Charter take precedence
over obligations under a bilateral agreement. 
Presence of United Nations Military Observers Group in
India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) at the Line of Control in
Kashmir is a clear evidence off UN's involvement in the
Kashmir issue. 
Jammu and Kashmir is a disputed territory. It dies not
involve the principle of respect for the unity and
territorial integrity of states, to which Pakistan adheres. 
Attempts to forcibley suppress the legitimate demands
of the people of Jammu and Kashmir are doomed to
failure. Similarly, threats of use of force will not affect
Pakistan's resolve to maintain its position of principle. 
 
Greets
Mr_Sweet , AntiChrist , Devil-C , cynic , 139_r00ted , v00d00 , McIntyre , ULG ,
LevelSeven , bl0w team , ALOC , ne0h , HiP , Xessor , mistuh clean , exode , lyp0x ,
Da^Bomb , mozy , k0ld , HIT2000 , HCV , un1x b0wl1ng t34m , hacksta , syxx ,
cult_hero , dr_fdisk^ , Hi-Tech Hate , gH , team spl0it , Stonehenge Crew , FL3M ,
attrition.org , hackernews.com , dutchthreat.org , projectgamma.com , net-security.org
and all the others i miss..

*<:0)